The record
What the public record says.
Quotes and figures only. Every card is dated and sourced. The desk states structure and sequence; it alleges nothing.
Beyond the desk's corpus — what the record shows.
The largest registrar's annual report describes an aftermarket platform that "processes aftermarket, or secondary, domain name sales" while it "maintain[s] a portfolio of more than 1.0 million domain names," and provides "functionality for the entire registrar network to list expiring domains." Aftermarket revenue is recorded on a gross basis because the company "take[s] control of the domain" — it sells as principal, not only as agent — and it lists among its risks "increases in rates of failed sales… in which we act as the primary obligor, resulting in higher than expected domain portfolio assets."
GoDaddy Inc., Form 10-K FY2024 (filed Feb 2025), Items 1, 1A, 7 and Note 2 · accessed 2026-09-03Aftermarket revenue grew 5.0% in 2024 "due to increasing sales volume," then accelerated through 2025: $128M in Q1 (+5%, average transaction $321 vs $261 a year earlier), $119M in Q2, $136M in Q3 (+28%) as "large transactions returned."
GoDaddy 10-K FY2024 MD&A; Domain Name Wire, May 1 and Oct 30, 2025 · accessed 2026-09-03Effective February 1, 2023, the four marketplaces under one roof (Auctions, Afternic, Uniregistry, Dan) moved to 15% commission when the name points to the company's own nameservers and 25% when it does not.
GoDaddy blog, "Aftermarket alignment — update to commission model," Jan 4, 2023 · accessed 2026-09-03In early April 2023 the free appraisal tool was re-based: "GoDaddy added a ton of new data to GoValue last month, which will have influenced valuations across the board." Investors documented names that had shown above $1,000 printing under $100 afterward. In March 2024 the tool was capped at three free appraisals a day and stopped showing comparable sales.
James Iles (GoDaddy), NamePros, May 4, 2023; NamePros threads May 2023 and Mar 20, 2024 · accessed 2026-09-03The same company holds inventory at scale: the Uniregistry portfolio of ~350,000 names ($196.9M, 2020), ~200,000 names from Marchex ($281M), 70,000 from Most Wanted Domains ($30–35M, 2015) — and runs pricing experiments on "tens of thousands" of its own names against control groups, reporting a 22% revenue lift from charm pricing in the $2,500–$10,000 band.
GoDaddy press release Feb 11, 2020 (primary); Domain Name Wire; DomainInvesting.com; GoDaddy blog, Mar 29, 2023 (primary) · accessed 2026-09-03Public sales datasets lean toward the expiry stream by construction: auction results are captured automatically, while owner-listed sales on Afternic and Dan are reported only when a party volunteers them and Sedo reports only $2,000-plus. And on 118 real, publicly reported sales, two widely used third-party appraisers returned $0 on 70% of names that actually sold (EstiBot) and missed by a median of 100% and 94.5%; even the better of the two missed by 50% or more on 80% of names.
NameBio methodology notes; desk opacity study (composite_4way, Mar 2026) — attributed to the tools tested, not to any registrarThe desk states the structure and the record. It does not allege intent by any company and does not claim that any appraisal caused any lapse. Read it as arithmetic: a party that profits from expiry-and-resale, holds a seven-figure portfolio of its own, sells as principal, and also publishes the free number an owner sees at renewal has incentives that do not point the same way as the owner's. That is a market design problem — and the reason this desk exists.